<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for RethinkingOurStory</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rethinkingourstory.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rethinkingourstory.com</link>
	<description>A One-Year Project:  Retelling the Christian Story</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2011 13:04:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Week 5:  Rethinking God (part 1) by Doug Hammack</title>
		<link>http://www.rethinkingourstory.com/week-5-rethinking-god-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-446</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Hammack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2011 13:04:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rethinkingourstory.com/?p=116#comment-446</guid>
		<description>Thank you my friend.  It&#039;s nice to know you&#039;re listening.  Doug</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you my friend.  It&#8217;s nice to know you&#8217;re listening.  Doug</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Week 24: Rethinking What Happened (2) by Doug Hammack</title>
		<link>http://www.rethinkingourstory.com/week-24-rethinking-what-happened-2/comment-page-1/#comment-445</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Hammack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2011 13:02:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rethinkingourstory.com/?p=530#comment-445</guid>
		<description>As this section highlights, when we tell the story of God, Jesus, sin, and salvation using the substitutionary atonement metaphor (remember, just one of many historically Christian metaphors for salvation), we paint God in a light that is counter to all we say about &quot;God&#039;s love&quot; about &quot;God&#039;s goodness&quot; and about the Divine being characterized by grace and mercy.  If God creates us with the knowledge that we&#039;d get ourselves into this pickle, and then turns his back on us when we do...  what kind of God is that?  

But perhaps our dilemma is that we&#039;ve pressed a good metaphor too far.  All metaphors eventually break down.  I think the substitutionary atonement metaphor breaks down when we use it to define God&#039;s character.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As this section highlights, when we tell the story of God, Jesus, sin, and salvation using the substitutionary atonement metaphor (remember, just one of many historically Christian metaphors for salvation), we paint God in a light that is counter to all we say about &#8220;God&#8217;s love&#8221; about &#8220;God&#8217;s goodness&#8221; and about the Divine being characterized by grace and mercy.  If God creates us with the knowledge that we&#8217;d get ourselves into this pickle, and then turns his back on us when we do&#8230;  what kind of God is that?  </p>
<p>But perhaps our dilemma is that we&#8217;ve pressed a good metaphor too far.  All metaphors eventually break down.  I think the substitutionary atonement metaphor breaks down when we use it to define God&#8217;s character.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Week 24: Rethinking What Happened (2) by Theodore A. Jones</title>
		<link>http://www.rethinkingourstory.com/week-24-rethinking-what-happened-2/comment-page-1/#comment-444</link>
		<dc:creator>Theodore A. Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Feb 2011 23:53:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rethinkingourstory.com/?p=530#comment-444</guid>
		<description>If you don&#039;t mind and it is not an imposition what do you mean by &quot;the many unintended and negative consequences&quot; relative to the &quot;old way&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you don&#8217;t mind and it is not an imposition what do you mean by &#8220;the many unintended and negative consequences&#8221; relative to the &#8220;old way&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Week 5:  Rethinking God (part 1) by Genny</title>
		<link>http://www.rethinkingourstory.com/week-5-rethinking-god-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-443</link>
		<dc:creator>Genny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Feb 2011 20:13:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rethinkingourstory.com/?p=116#comment-443</guid>
		<description>I deeply appreciate what you&#039;ve written here, Doug. Thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I deeply appreciate what you&#8217;ve written here, Doug. Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Week 30:  Rethinking What Happened (8) by Michael S</title>
		<link>http://www.rethinkingourstory.com/week-30-rethinking-what-happened-8/comment-page-1/#comment-399</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 19:49:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rethinkingourstory.com/?p=646#comment-399</guid>
		<description>Hey Doug- I really enjoy the diversity in the atonement models. As we&#039;ve discussed before, considering no models can ever be exact and we aren&#039;t in a place where we can rationally understand everything anyway, it&#039;s great to consider all the options. Maybe we can&#039;t get totally out of the box, but they help make the box a lot bigger, and God a lot more approachable. Thanks so much for the eye opening!

So as we deconstruct and rebuild, I wonder if we have an opportunity to interweave scripture in a way that we end up with a new model that is closer to the truth? Of course we run the risk of our 19th century brothers and sisters...there is some truth in the substitution theory and perhaps they were doing their best to find a model that worked with what they knew. To me it appears they tried to take scripture as literally as possible and to force a &#039;single answer&#039;. And hopefully we have learned something from their efforts.

With that said, are there any good online resources where all scripture associated with atonement have been collected, studied, and conglomerated?  Other than your blog, I&#039;ve found lots of material on the theories themselves, but very little of... here&#039;s all the scripture, here&#039;s lots of commentary...what works from each of these models?

On the other hand, I&#039;ve been rereading the bible with &quot;the message&#039; translation recenlty and am starting to find lots of new stuff for myself...so maybe that&#039;s the point, anyway...ie we all have the Word and Spirit and in a &#039;Luther&#039; kind of way need to do this for ourselves, eh?

On the other hand, I have no concerns about standing on shoulders of giants:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Doug- I really enjoy the diversity in the atonement models. As we&#8217;ve discussed before, considering no models can ever be exact and we aren&#8217;t in a place where we can rationally understand everything anyway, it&#8217;s great to consider all the options. Maybe we can&#8217;t get totally out of the box, but they help make the box a lot bigger, and God a lot more approachable. Thanks so much for the eye opening!</p>
<p>So as we deconstruct and rebuild, I wonder if we have an opportunity to interweave scripture in a way that we end up with a new model that is closer to the truth? Of course we run the risk of our 19th century brothers and sisters&#8230;there is some truth in the substitution theory and perhaps they were doing their best to find a model that worked with what they knew. To me it appears they tried to take scripture as literally as possible and to force a &#8217;single answer&#8217;. And hopefully we have learned something from their efforts.</p>
<p>With that said, are there any good online resources where all scripture associated with atonement have been collected, studied, and conglomerated?  Other than your blog, I&#8217;ve found lots of material on the theories themselves, but very little of&#8230; here&#8217;s all the scripture, here&#8217;s lots of commentary&#8230;what works from each of these models?</p>
<p>On the other hand, I&#8217;ve been rereading the bible with &#8220;the message&#8217; translation recenlty and am starting to find lots of new stuff for myself&#8230;so maybe that&#8217;s the point, anyway&#8230;ie we all have the Word and Spirit and in a &#8216;Luther&#8217; kind of way need to do this for ourselves, eh?</p>
<p>On the other hand, I have no concerns about standing on shoulders of giants:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Week 29: Rethinking What Happened (7) by RethinkingOurStory &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Week 30: Rethinking What Happened (8)</title>
		<link>http://www.rethinkingourstory.com/week-29-rethinking-what-happened-7/comment-page-1/#comment-384</link>
		<dc:creator>RethinkingOurStory &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Week 30: Rethinking What Happened (8)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2010 19:21:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rethinkingourstory.com/?p=624#comment-384</guid>
		<description>[...] RethinkingOurStory A One-Year Project: Retelling the Christian Story      &#171; Week 29: Rethinking What Happened (7) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] RethinkingOurStory A One-Year Project: Retelling the Christian Story      &laquo; Week 29: Rethinking What Happened (7) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Week 25: Rethinking What Happened (3) by Michael S</title>
		<link>http://www.rethinkingourstory.com/week-25-rethinking-what-happened-3/comment-page-1/#comment-377</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2010 16:05:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rethinkingourstory.com/?p=547#comment-377</guid>
		<description>Absolutely no idea (other than blaspheming the Holy Spirit)- I imagined you would explain this from the &quot;big S, little s&quot; POV.

In my mind, sin is sin is sin...we all fall short. We either &quot;work out your salvation with fear and trembling&quot; or we don&#039;t. We&#039;ve talked about the teaching model that I gravitate towards... we&#039;re either walking towards the gate or away from it... but we always have the last second opportunity to walk on through (as the thief on the cross).

Of course Jesus said that blaspheming the Holy Spirit was the only unpardonable sin, but that doesn&#039;t seem to be the fatal sin addressed in 1John, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolutely no idea (other than blaspheming the Holy Spirit)- I imagined you would explain this from the &#8220;big S, little s&#8221; POV.</p>
<p>In my mind, sin is sin is sin&#8230;we all fall short. We either &#8220;work out your salvation with fear and trembling&#8221; or we don&#8217;t. We&#8217;ve talked about the teaching model that I gravitate towards&#8230; we&#8217;re either walking towards the gate or away from it&#8230; but we always have the last second opportunity to walk on through (as the thief on the cross).</p>
<p>Of course Jesus said that blaspheming the Holy Spirit was the only unpardonable sin, but that doesn&#8217;t seem to be the fatal sin addressed in 1John, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Week 25: Rethinking What Happened (3) by Doug Hammack</title>
		<link>http://www.rethinkingourstory.com/week-25-rethinking-what-happened-3/comment-page-1/#comment-376</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Hammack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2010 15:51:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rethinkingourstory.com/?p=547#comment-376</guid>
		<description>this is interesting.  and what do you think are the fatal forms of sin?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is interesting.  and what do you think are the fatal forms of sin?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Week 25: Rethinking What Happened (3) by Michael S</title>
		<link>http://www.rethinkingourstory.com/week-25-rethinking-what-happened-3/comment-page-1/#comment-374</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2010 18:43:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rethinkingourstory.com/?p=547#comment-374</guid>
		<description>Doug-
I guess it&#039;s more than ironic that I bumped into this translation today of 1John 5:16-17 

&quot;For instance, if we see a Christian believer sinning (clearly I&#039;m not talking about those who make a practice of sin in a way that is &quot;fatal,&quot; leading to eternal death), we ask for God&#039;s help and he gladly gives it, gives life to the sinner whose sin is not fatal. There is such a thing as a fatal sin, and I&#039;m not urging you to pray about that. Everything we do wrong is sin, but not all sin is fatal.

 18-21We know that none of the God-begotten makes a practice of sin—fatal sin.&quot;

I guess I&#039;ve read this 100 times before and didn&#039;t understand it...frankly, it&#039;s still confusing considering the other scripture referenced above. 

But does appear there is a difference is fatal and non-fatal sin so thanks for getting my eyes opened to look for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doug-<br />
I guess it&#8217;s more than ironic that I bumped into this translation today of 1John 5:16-17 </p>
<p>&#8220;For instance, if we see a Christian believer sinning (clearly I&#8217;m not talking about those who make a practice of sin in a way that is &#8220;fatal,&#8221; leading to eternal death), we ask for God&#8217;s help and he gladly gives it, gives life to the sinner whose sin is not fatal. There is such a thing as a fatal sin, and I&#8217;m not urging you to pray about that. Everything we do wrong is sin, but not all sin is fatal.</p>
<p> 18-21We know that none of the God-begotten makes a practice of sin—fatal sin.&#8221;</p>
<p>I guess I&#8217;ve read this 100 times before and didn&#8217;t understand it&#8230;frankly, it&#8217;s still confusing considering the other scripture referenced above. </p>
<p>But does appear there is a difference is fatal and non-fatal sin so thanks for getting my eyes opened to look for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Week 24: Rethinking What Happened (2) by RethinkingOurStory &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Rethinking What Happened (7)</title>
		<link>http://www.rethinkingourstory.com/week-24-rethinking-what-happened-2/comment-page-1/#comment-358</link>
		<dc:creator>RethinkingOurStory &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Rethinking What Happened (7)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2010 14:10:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rethinkingourstory.com/?p=530#comment-358</guid>
		<description>[...] Earlier in this section, we spent considerable time talking about the substitutionary atonement theory. This prominent historical metaphor for salvation, we said, has some glaring, usually unspoken, problems. Simply restated, Jesus&#8217; death was a sacrifice in the vein of Hebrew Law, and as the Lamb of God, Jesus death assuaged God&#8217;s wrath against humanity for their sin through the shedding of innocent blood. We outlined the problems with this, in that it makes God unreliable, capricious, angry, and unjust. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Earlier in this section, we spent considerable time talking about the substitutionary atonement theory. This prominent historical metaphor for salvation, we said, has some glaring, usually unspoken, problems. Simply restated, Jesus&#8217; death was a sacrifice in the vein of Hebrew Law, and as the Lamb of God, Jesus death assuaged God&#8217;s wrath against humanity for their sin through the shedding of innocent blood. We outlined the problems with this, in that it makes God unreliable, capricious, angry, and unjust. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

